The Awesome Dudes and Mothers Representative Party website (always a work-in-progress)

If you want to have a good country, you need to listen to the people who do the good things - the very clearly good things. Some things are more clearly good than others. Don't bother listening to some "leader" or "authority" who hasn't done really good.

A lot of what is really good, is behaviour that is really necessary and/or brings happiness, and it does not require authority, and it comes of love and happiness.

When the most giving is the most leading, then everyone gets the most out of being led.

That is real equality.

Throw out all your other stupid models of what equality is. This is all you need. 

You should get the social power that you give.

By the way, libtards (woke traditionalist opressors), social power cannot be given by the use of social power. It doesn't work like that.

Social power comes of material power.

For example, you are not able to socially empower someone if you are unable to move or otherwise manipulate objects.

If you were a king and you ordered the social empowerment of someone, that would not actually come from you - it would come from your materially powerful subjects who do as you say. Simple words, free from structure, do not socially empower - though the Equality Party (boomer brainrot) seem to think otherwise. Things socially empower, including bodies. Functionally, we contend with a world of things and bodies.

Only a complex social structure can be fit for the complex physical structures of our brains and bodies.

To hang on to the single word "equality" is the mental and political equivalent of devolving to being a single-celled organism.

The Awesome Dudes and Mothers Representative Party offers a complexity fit for the stars. It is above the social structures of the day, while the Equality Party is below - operating within - a reactionary and tyrannical force, making it weak. Like every other party, their principles are shallow.

There is no sign of weakness greater than saying you are "fighting" politically, when you are, in fact, frightened.  ⤵

THE CHILD INDOCTRINATION SYSTEM MUST END

and a bit of war would be nice, too. Places to conquer, you know - to give children a humane education system

Liberal democracy shall be delivered

Someone's main thing that they do (e.g. in any given week) should never be politics, and if it is, their personal opinion shouldn't particularly matter.

Especially if someone's main activity is politics, then they should just be a middleman, doing a job as lacking in authority as any other. You can read how the Awesome Party intends to do this.

The only opinion of a politician that could matter, is their opinion on whose opinions are the most important – meaning, what kinds of people – "kinds of people" meaning what they do.

I have come to the conclusion that the best decision-making would come from a decision-making process involving awesome dudes and mothers.  This comes from the idea that men are more likely to hyper-focus on one particular grand task, and are not good at unifying their ideas, and therefore it is no use that they debate. It is more useful that, in order for a group of men to remain united, they communicate their ambitions to a potentially smaller group of mothers whose job it is to unify their visions, such that they will cooperate. This goes by the sense that women are "lateral thinkers" and united by default, whereas men are "vertical thinkers" and focused by default, and that power comes from uniting focus. The focusers cannot unite themselves. It comes from the idea that men are dominating and women are uniting.

So, instead of wasting energy on each other, the men primarily do their masculine activity, and then to avoid inevitably clashing their energies or being isolated in their efforts, they will tell their desires to the women who do the primary female role of loving their offspring, and the women may discuss it and then tell the men what the solution is - which is not simply her own idea, as that would be inequality, but, a combination of the men's ideas, which is of course made realistic by her thought process.

The leadership is ultimately regarding what men do, which is more open-ended than what women are expected to do, and women are expected to be gentle and submissive (because they simply are, relative to men), so there is no need for them to be united because they are naturally united and unambitious. Therefore, it is men who need to seek soft women for their ability to unite them.

It doesn't really make sense for a woman to have a "leader" (or be a leader) in the way that a man does. Like, the leadership of men and the leadership of women is completely different. The women just need to be good women (which is easy for men to decide), but in order for men to be good, they have to be united by women that they've chosen.

For a public policy or project idea to reach the mothers for uniting, it would have to be passed on to an awesome dude first, who then might propose the idea to the mothers if he likes it.

In the physical world, this setup would be simply a group of men who regularly go to a group of women to speak their minds, awaiting the conflict resolution and/or unifying direction returned by the women. The women would not direct the men on their own accord, because it is the men who are seeking to lead themselves and remain united, by using women's abilities to think laterally. The men's unity in turn helps them to provide for the children and make and live in utopia.

This setup can be mirrored in the political world. Since we have digital technology, physical presence isn't necessary, and millions of people can basically be united in this way.

Party policy will be informed by a decision-making process involving the councils of awesome dudes and the councils of mothers, which will be informal contact lists and chat groups that the Party has access to, at least 50% composed of people randomly found IRL and checked (for their awesomeness and mothering) by Party candidates/staff.

An opinion of the Party Leader, or anyone of the Party, would have to be approved by the decision-making process, before possible implementation. The Oversight Committees will check that those doing political activity for the Party are actually acting/speaking in the interests of the 'two councils'.

There will be a national two councils, and there will be two councils per constituency. An MP for a particular constituency will in particular represent the views and ideas of the two councils of their constituency. They will not represent their own views or speak their own mind. The Party will manage its MPs such that this is prevented.

A national two councils will be composed of particularly great members from the constituency councils.

Members of the Party councils can be anonymous to the public.

To contact the Party Leader:   angulardoublehelix@gmail.com 

On the one hand, I am too angry at the political class, and on the other hand, I'm not angry enough. Just know that there is a part of my brain in which my blood boils in infinite anger and infinite hatred for the political class, who are generally aged 40 to 70.  (I'm 24)

In an ideal world, I wouldn't be verbally abusing anyone, but we don't live in an ideal world, and the politicians abused their undeserved power first, so I'm justified.

Giving power to the power-seeking leads to abuse of said power, which is what voting for someone who says "Vote for me!" is.

"The meek shall inherit the Earth".

Meme images and YouTube videos to humiliate professional politicians:

Labour, you call yourself the party of the working people, but it appears to me that you absolutely hate the working people.

When I was 5, the first job I wanted was to be a street cleaner, and as an adult I only quit my job as a (Biffa, Abingdon) street cleanser due to head pains related to the education system.

If someone wants a career as a street cleanser, why must he sit through algebra, science, drama, art, assembly, and all this other useless nonsense before doing what he wants.

Why can't he just start litter picking already??

Why can't he just work out when he wants, play sports when he wants, and learn about working class jobs, which the education system doesn't teach about?

The education system doesn't teach driving, and it doesn't teach street cleansing techniques. It only teaches specific things. All the while, you're, in many cases, forced to wear a shirt and tie, if that wasn't bad enough.

Like, seriously, you teach drama, art and music in secondary school, which are "upper class" jobs, but driving and building doesn't matter?

Why force him through this nonsense, and then he comes out the other side with his soul destroyed and you call yourself the party of the working class (well, you changed it to "working people", but I remember)

You're more interested in middle/upper class trans activists than the working class.

It's about time somebody popped your bubble!

CENTRISTS ARE DESTROYING THE WORLD.

CAPITALISTS AND COMMUNISTS RISE UP AGAINST TAXATION AND STATE RETARDATION.

The centrists gotta go! They gotta go!

Centrists include: Lib Dems, SNP, Reform, Conservatives, Labour etc.

Greens have a few ideas that the education system is bad, but they're too stupid to actually have a plan

I'm not saying that we can't have your autistic little grading and qualification system to some degree, for those who want it. What I am saying is, you don't need to do an English exam just to be literate. There's a reason kids stay out of school. It's because they know that our "leaders" are airheads, themselves victims of the system that they perpetuate.

It's called wisdom of the crowd, when kids don't take school seriously. You might think they're just being stupid, but, actually, stupid kind of doesn't exist. The leaders should take the wisdom of the crowd seriously instead of just autistically cracking down as though a rigid, top-down control school system is the answer to life, the universe, and everything that will see humanity through as it reaches for the stars.

Those that taste the bite of my words - the dark lords who have wronged me -  may call me the Doom Slayer.

It's not over. Western Civilisation is not over anymore.

Oh, another thing. Take your "left/right divide" and throw it in the fucking garbage.

There is no such thing when you're aren't a fucking idiot.

There are no left-wing policies and right-wing policies when you're a genius. There are good ones and bad ones.

No more jargon.

No more buzzwords.

This is the end of the decrepit old political world that has lost all meaning yet is still clinging on.

All you old fucks do is divide (and deride) people. That's fucking it. That's all you achieve. Unity is possible when you use your brain, because you can realise that we are one, and we should love each other, like Jesus said.

When you zoom out to all of time and space, knowing how little time you have in the universe relative to eternity, you know that love is ultimately what you want, and makes success, and what connects people across time, making you have a place in eternity, by your love which unifies you with past, present, small and large.

Yes, you can have unity by division, when you use your brain. That's the only way you can have unity, is by letting people divide themselves, as opposed to dividing people.

Many things are possible when you use your brain. Glorious things.

In horseshoe theory, these two have more in common with each other than the abnormal slightly intelligent person:

• The genius

• The average person

Regarding Terry Davis, my name is Thierry Weisen, and I also loved ants when I was a kid, and was a genius level programmer (although from my perspective, everyone else my age was just a fucking idiot. I didn't rebel in school, although I came close, but now I know I would have been absolutely justified, had I rebelled against the retarded ass fucking adults that I was actually more intelligent than)

This means that, if I would have been justified in rebelling against school, then everyone else who has rebelled, and does rebel, is justified, too.

FUCK YOU GOVERNMENT. WHY DON'T YOU GIVE A FUCK ABOUT KIDS and then pretend with Ofsted that you "care" or whatever. IT'S A FUCKEN LIE.

I, AND THE ENTIRE COUNTRY, HAS BEEN DRAGGED THROUGH A LIE.

I WONDER WHAT OTHER ESTABLISHMENT LIES ARE BEING TOLD TO KIDS?

TAKE YOUR GCSEs, and 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬

Your A levels. Your T levels. Your this. Your that.

All these buzzwords. This jargon. WE DON'T NEED THEM. IT'S NOT WHAT'S IMPORTANT.

KIDS NOT CATTLE

"Portfolio" this, punctuality that, across the board. IT'S DISGUSTING and IT'S UNDUE STRESS, and it's IGNORANCE OF WHAT ACTUALLY MAKES A FUNCTIONING CIVILIZATION.

I don't care if you grew up with it and it's all you've ever known. (Leadership is to boldly go into the great unknown, in the hopes of bringing treasure)

IT'S NOT NATURAL. THINK OF HUMAN HISTORY.

YOU'RE DONE. 🔥👺⚔️

I will go to war over this shit, at least if that's what it takes.

You have two choices, government:

1. Reform 2. Civil war (more like a bloodless coup like in Syria, but anyway)

You get what you deserve. You mess with me, I mess with you.

Sorry that being a LEADER OF A COUNTRY isn't a walk in the park,

and that grassroots rebellions will take place if you just sit on your throne for decades in a way that demonstrates real lack of empathy and lack of striving for your people.

The virtue signalling has been real. Oh yeah, your racial justice, your gender this, your, whatever bro, you don't know anything. It's cheap points. But guess what? Cheap points don't work when you're supposed to lead a country.

They might have given you an extra decade of throne time, but eventually people see how thin their "leadership" is. TODDLER LEVEL. FOOTBALL MATCH LEVEL. Politicians aren't supposed to be talking minor issues like it's the pub. IT'S NOT A SATURDAY AT WETHERSPOONS, YOU'RE IN THE HOUSE OF COMMONS, SO USE YOUR BRAIN LIKE YE ARE. That might seem a bit harsh, coming from a genius, but, if you lack intelligence, you can always make up for it with empathy and knowing who is intelligent. The problem is, politicians are probably indoctrinated into thinking they're intelligent because they went to university, and they think that the fucking qualifications are proof of intelligence, when literally it just means you're average smart if you get straight As, because the qualifications are invented by average people. I'M TIRED OF AVERAGE PEOPLE TREATING COOL PEOPLE BADLY. Qualifications can tell you if someone cared and has a brain, but it can't tell you who's a good person or who's really smart.

I suggest we take our qualifications and rip them up, and maybe burn them after.

The state should not be forcing this crap on anyone. It's totally unneccesary. 

All the state needs to do is watch out for security and welfare. This crap has nothing to do with either.

The people can organise themselves to educate themselves. All we really need is basic literacy and numeracy and a few other things. We don't need years of compulsory slog in which parents and kids have no say.

Everybody who thinks qualifications are important is a dumb cultist licking the boot of the regime.

And don't you dare cry for employers. They'll be fine without this stuff being mindlessly pushed on every teenager.

Website designed and promoted by Thierry Weisen using Google Sites

Awesome Party PO box, Troon