Misogyny

When you're a boy, women are supposed to take care of you, but most of what women do to boys in this country (politicians' fault) is oppress them and then they complain about their gender pay gap or whatever. It's selfishness that leads to a flipped treatment of women. To begin with, a boy might be masculine and protective of women, but then he sees how badly women are behaving, and neglecting taking care of boys, and that flips in his brain. It's just a tit-for-tat.

My mother and my aunt have oppressed me by essentially discouraging me from playing, just because it was sandpit wrestling when I was five and playfighting when I was an older child.

My aunt said "no rough and tumble" regarding the play fighting after my cousin got a minor cut on his head. I just ignored her, but when you think about it, it's absolutely bonkers for her to think she has that authority.

Like, my enjoyment of play fighting could benefit her, but of course she only thinks about short-term idealism regarding herself.

So, then, what is the good in respecting women if they don't respect you?

Imagine if a man told a couple of girls to stop doing whatever girls play.

People would say "that's bonkers, they can do what they want".

Women have another trick up their sleeve to try to beat down boys, which is to get boys to start taking medication for ADHD or anxiety or whatever instead of just letting them be free so that they don't struggle with themselves in the first place.

They'll call you mentally ill, they'll tell you to stop playing and so on, but they won't give you the feminine care that they should.

That is the modern woke woman: self-absorbed.

Relating to this  topic, something I've seen on articles and heard from parliament recordings is this idea of "role models".

Role models are GAY.

Nobody needs "inspirations" or any of that. 

YOU'RE GAY. AND YOU'RE STANDING IN THE WAY. THAT'S THE PROBLEM. YOU. THE PEOPLE WHO THINK WE NEED ROLE MODELS, ARE THE PROBLEM. YOU'RE WEAK. AND YOU'RE PROJECTING. FUCK YOU

Before, we were scammed by you. Now, woke is being replaced by enlightenment, because we can see clearly you've done the people no real good, and brought in real evil - all the while virtue signalling cluelessly like you're the best people on the planet.

Instead of blaming social media, you should blame yourself, because you're the ones in charge.

But you will never take responsibility. It is always everyone else who is being bad, not you.

I'm on the side of big tech. They've done more for my childhood (education and entertainment) than contemporary politicians could ever dream of doing.

Thank you Google, and fuck you Government.

KSLV Chimera

Here's a related thing:

You've probably read "strong women" numerous times.

But, it's like, you've got it all wrong guys.

WEAK woman are admirable.

Weak women, strong men.

Not strong women, strong men, or something else.

That's sexual division of labour and stuff. That is power.

Strong women does not get you anywhere.

The whole point, or a large part of the point, in having men, is so that you can fuck around and find out as a species. So, it's like, you have men, and they're strong, so that women don't have to be. It's very inefficient to have strong women.

You might ask what is weakness anyway.

And I'd respond, I guess, physically weak, and, easily scared, etc.

And you might think what is admirable about being easily scared, but the point in men is so that women get to be scared, because men aren't scared. Then, you have efficiency based on sexual role. The female role being the one that actually produces the offspring.

So, that's why it doesn't make sense for women to be strong, when men exist so that women don't have to be.

And men don't have to worry about themselves, so long as they worry about women.

The species only works like that. You can't conquer the galaxy otherwise, if you be completely retarded and can't understand basic biology.

It basically relives a big weight, when you don't have to worry about yourself in stressful ways, because the other sex is doing that for you, and they're geared to doing it anyway.

Because the other sex is you. It's like, you're a helix in a double helix. You can't imagine yourself meaningfully seperate from the other sex, otherwise you have to stress yourself out with responsibilities that the other sex wants to do anyway.

For example, to me cooking is stressful. Why did they bother teaching me, and EVERYONE, cooking in school, instead of letting me specialise like I should have.

However, there are things that I find soothing and wonderful that women would find terrible.

So, you see, it's a double helix. So, just let people be themselves, instead of pretending that everyone is an independent atom.

That's what the education system is doing, treating every child as an independent atom. All seperate, and all the same.

It's so atrocious, absurd, unnatural, and terrible.

It's moulding everyone into this androgynous, impotent sludge. Or, it's trying to.

The politicians just inherited the education system and just took it for granted because replacing the entire system would be, to them, difficult, scary, and they simply take it for granted because they don't think for themselves.

This is why you've got people saying there's no difference between labour and the conservatives. It's because they're not actually passionate about anything, really. Love of something of the country, external to them, would really drive them to great lengths to figure out how preserve or increase that. This is why half of politics is just a matter of how much money is spent and the other half is about very stupid and surface-level changes. They never actually delve into systems. They don't *really* care. They just keep themselves occupied with easy stuff that doesn't require any imagination.

This is why the two parties have kept dragging their feet and kicking the ball along until suddenly the people are fed up and a different party freaks them out, which is what Reform has done, and Civ Sys will finish the job.

It's the consequences of their lack of passion.

It's also the consequences of lack of intelligence, leading then to make huge changes to the country in stupid ways such as mass migration, because they don't have the brains to make huge changes in smart ways, but they still want to feel like they're doing something and using their power for good. Unfortunately, they weren't good enough. They didn't recognise their position for what it was, and just acted as though everything they inherited and moved into was a masterfully designed machine that can't do wrong. They must have been power-seeking, more than anything, as opposed to interested in power-giving.

Jesus said to give, yet as far as I can tell, they did not use their political power to give political power.

Instead, when the Conservatives become desperate, they decided it was time to take away political power, and centralise more control, what with the idea of national service, and of course the idea of banning phones from classrooms and such.

Giving is harder than taking, so, of course, they tried to take.

I think that, in the future, the primary love will be between the sexes, and therefore, nobody will want to watch or play something in which the sexes don't treat each other kindly, meaning we won't be playing games where men and women shoot each other or watching media where there is serious tension between the sexes, because almost nobody will enjoy it.

Women will be protected by the culture, so, media in which women characters are hurt won't be a normal part of life like it is now.

Violence will be something for men to engage in to protect women, and men will actually engage in violence to do, instead of consuming media in which there are women engaged in and victims of violence.

So, therefore, we will tell all developers of violent games to remove their female characters, in line with the new morality, if they want to keep making money.

Shows like Squid Game will be banned. I haven't seen it but I'm sure it's disgusting and doesn't deserve to exist.